50 GLO Discussion Papers have been published – and many more to come!
So far the GLO Discussion Papers have experienced over 700 Downloads.
The Top 10 downloaded GLO Discussion Papers are – provided by RePEc for 03/2017:
1 GLO DP 32 Smog in Our Brains: Gender Differences in the Impact of Exposure to Air Pollution on Cognitive Performance – Download PDF
by Chen, Xi & Zhang, Xiaobo & Zhang, Xin
2 GLO DP 24 Changes in Bargaining Status and Intra-Plant Wage Dispersion in Germany. Much Ado about Nothing? – Download PDF
by Addison, John T. & Teixeira, Paulino & Evers, Katalin & Kölling, Arnd
3 GLO DP 11 Vulnerability to Poverty: Tajikistan during and after the Global Financial Crisis – Download PDF
by Gang, Ira N. & Gatskova, Kseniia & Landon-Lane, John & Yun, Myeong-Su
4 GLO DP 3 Economic Shocks and Crime: Evidence from the Brazilian Trade Liberalization – Download PDF
by Dix-Carneiro, Rafael & Soares, Rodrigo R. & Ulysse, Gabriel
5 GLO DP 5 Sources of the Union Wage Gap: Results from High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Regression Models – Download PDF
by Addison, John T. & Portugal, Pedro & Vilares, Hugo
6 GLO DP 4 On Asymmetric Migration Patterns from Developing Countries – Download PDF
by Acharyya, Rajat & Kar, Saibal
6 GLO DP 19 The chips are down: The influence of family on children’s trust formation – Download PDF
by Giulietti, Corrado & Rettore, Enrico & Tonini, Sara
8 GLO DP 14 The Productivity Impact of Business Mobility: International Evidence – Download PDF
by Piva, Mariacristina & Tani, Massimiliano & Vivarelli, Marco
8 GLO DP 40 Is the gender pay gap in the US just the result of gender segregation at work? – Download PDF
by Meara, Katie & Pastore, Francesco & Webster, Allan
GLO Discussion Papers are research and policy papers from GLO Fellows and are provided in cooperation with EconStor, a service of the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, and RePEc.
GLO Discussion Papers are among others listed in RePEc – see IDEAS and EconPapers.
Any opinions expressed in the GLO Discussion Paper Series are those of the author(s) and not those of the GLO and while they may contain specific views on policy, the GLO itself does not take any institutional policy positions.